Grading Students
When you implement UDL principles in your classroom, there will always be issues about how to grade students. Is it “fair”… for a student who writes a good 6-page paper explaining the causes and results of the Great Depression …and a student who makes an instructive 16-screen PowerPoint with audio and video links to highlight certain points about the causes and results of the Great Depression …and a student who writes a short play to illustrate his knowledge about the causes and results of the Great Depression for a typical family of that time… to each get an A or a B? Should the “hardest” task get an A and the others get something else? What is the “hardest” task? Does the hardest task represent the most learning? Who has made progress in their understanding of the Great Depression?
Dave Edyburn (University of Wisconsin/Milwaukee) has provided a nice bibliography of sources that address this topic. Zero and Grading Policies
You can also go to the following sites on the Internet for information:
An Introduction to Grading by Dennis Munk, with links to instructional tools and research related to grading. It also has links to actual case studies dealing with grading. : http://www.specialconnections.ku.edu/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/specconn/main.php?cat=assessment§ion=grading/main
Grading Policies That Work Against Standards…and How to Fix Them by T.R. Guskey: http://www.ncacasi.org/documents/other/grading_policies
Fair & Equitable Grading Practices for Students with LD Who Have IEPs, by D.D. Munk: http://www.schwablearning.org/articles.aspx?r=1154
Role of Zero in Grading by Karen Walker, with links to other online articles about grading: http://www.principalspartnership.com/zerograding.pdf